Teddy Roosevelt said, “I have always said I would not have been President had it not been for my experience in North Dakota.” Well, I would not have my environmental view had it not been for these 5 places. As an environmental professional, I work to find the balance between a clean, beautiful natural environment, human health, useable land, and productive facilities. Therefore, my Top 5 environmentally influential places are the following.
1. Southwestern and Central Pennsylvania, for its geology and geography. The old rocks, rolling hills and valleys, the landslides, the coal. It’s where I developed an appreciation for earth sciences. First, on my own spending time in those hills and valleys and second, it’s where I studied geology at Penn State University.
3. New York, NY, and not just Manhattan, but the rivers, bridges, and coastlines. Most people don’t associate the big cities with the word “environment,” but my time working in New York impressed on me the need to give more attention toward clean, healthy cities and not just focus on preserving our natural open space.
4. Denver, CO. Before moving to Denver I had the common outsiders view that the city is a laid back, ski town with a football team. It is that, but that’s not all. As the only major city for hundreds of miles in any direction, Denver mixes the cultures of the outdoor enthusiasts with what has been described as a “cow town.” It’s where I was introduced to the environmental balance of the mountain west – preservation, water, natural resources, and recreation use.
5. Montana. It truly is big sky country. The mountain west is often overlooked in our country, primarily due to the low population density. I wish people from the coastal cities could spend some time in Montana (only briefly of course), because you can’t appreciate its size, scope and beauty merely with photos and movies. You need to spend time walking, driving, skiing, running, or fishing under the big sky.